Period of composition:
1799-early 1800. Date of Publication: December
1801, by Hoffmeister & Kuhnel, dedicated to
Baron Gottfried van Swieten.
Background
details:
After leaving
Bonn in November 1792 to begin life as a pupil of
Haydn in Vienna, we had to wait a further eight
years for Beethoven to produce his first
symphony. This reason for this delay has
traditionally been put down to Beethoven's
respect for Mozart and Haydn, and his ambition to
produce a work on equal terms with these
symphonic masters. However Beethoven had
considered symphonic composition earlier in his
life, producing extensive sketches for a symphony
in C in 1795/96 while he was studying with
Albrechtsburger. Earlier still there is a sketch
in C minor labeled 'sinfonia'. Op. 21 was first
performed on April 2nd 1800 at the Burgtheater in
Vienna. Beethoven's Septet, and one of his piano
concertos (Op.15 or Op.19) were also performed. A
correspondent from the Allgemeine Musikalische
Zeitung was at the concert and described the
symphony as having 'considerable art, novelty and
a wealth of ideas', the only flaw being 'the wind
instruments were used too much, so that there was
more harmony than orchestral music as a whole.'
Musical
outline:
Stylistically,
the symphony is rather reserved work when
compared to the emotion and raw passion of some
of his other compositions of this period such as
the 'Sonata Pathetique' Op.13, or the slow
movements of Op.7 or Op.10 no.3. Clearly,
Beethoven had decided to introduce himself to the
symphonic world by staying on safe ground before
venturing off to horizons new. The first movement
opens with a slow introductory 'Adagio molto'
before moving to a vigorous 'Allegro con brio'
who's first theme has been compared to that of
Mozart's 'Jupiter' symphony. The following slow
movement isn't particularly slow, being 'Andante
cantabile con moto', and is almost the minuet
that the third movement isn't. It is in sonata
form and is lightweight, although modern
performances tend to add more breadth and gravity
than is strictly required here. The third
movement is titled 'Menuetto: Allegro molto e
vivace', though it has the character more of a
scherzo than a minuet. The final movement has
great wit, with its famous 'joke' introduction
(Adagio) that had its origins in the abandoned
1795 sketches, before the Haydnish 'Allegro molto
e vivace'. The piece ends in a thoroughly
Beethovenish manner however, with the march-like
coda.
Recommended
Recordings:
I haven't any
exeptional recommendations, John Eliot Gardiner
and the Orch. Rev. et Rom. (Archiv) offer good
quick tempi but the sound lacks any ambience. The
Hanover Band's (Nimbus) pace in the first
movement more relaxed but the sound is very
ambient and colourful, although the brass could
have more prominence. These are both period
instrument versions.
| Symphony
No.2 in D major op.36 |
Period of composition:
1801-1802 Date of Publication: 1804, by Kunst und
Industrie Comptior, dedicated to Prince Karl von
Lichnowsky.
Background
details:
If proof were
needed that 'the true artist creates out of his
total experience', as Denis Matthews put it, then
one need only look at the circumstances
surrounding the composition of op.36. For this
brilliant and original piece was completed during
Beethoven's summer break in Heiligenstadt in
1802, the time of his greatest despair on
realization that his increasing deafness could be
a permanent affliction. The symphony was first
performed on 5 April 1803 at a concert at the
Theater an Der Wien which also included the
premieres of Beethoven's C minor piano concerto
and oratario 'Christus am Oelberge'. The critic
present from the Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung
describe the new symphony typically, as "a
work full of new, original ideas, of great
strength, sensitive in orchestration and
intellectual in concept, but one that would
surely benefit from the abbreviation of some
passages and the deletion [!] of others, for the
modulations are entirely too eccentric."
Musical
outline:
The vigorous
independence that Beethoven had shown in his
chamber works had now surfaced in the world of
the symphony, though it bears features reminicant
of Mozart's 'Prague' symphony. Thayer, who
purposefully kept musical criticism to an
absolute minimum in his 'Life of Beethoven' could
not contain himself when discussing this
composition - "a work whose grand and
imposing introduction - brilliant Allegro, a
Larghetto so lovely, so pure and amiably
conceived...a Scherzo as merry, wayward, skipping
and charming as anything possible...and a Finale,
the very intoxication of a spirit 'intoxicated
with fire'- made it...an era both in the life of
its author and in the history of instrumental
music." Passionate words from the usually
reserved Thayer! After the opening
call-to-attention, the slow introduction is
rather more imposing than that of the first
symphony with a powerful D minor climax that is
reminicant of the opening of the first movement
of the Ninth Symphony. The main Allegro has great
drive with and ends with splendid coda. The
lyrical Larghetto casts a backward glance at the
previous century, with phrases that suggest Haydn
or Mozart. It is however, a substantial and
serious affair in sonata form and, like the First
Symphony, withholds timpani and trumpets (the
instruments of war!). With the third movement
Beethoven acknowledges it as 'Scherzo' rather
than labour it with the more traditional
'Menuetto' as he did with the First. This is pure
Beethovenian humour, with a three note figure
that is passed around the orchestra.The vitality
of the finale (Allegro molto) is apparent from
the explosive opening gesture. It is in
sonata-form without repeats (the impression of a
repeat occurs but this merely forms to opening of
the development). The coda is massive, taking up
more than a third of the whole movement. A
reviewer in 1804 described this finale as
"an uncivilized monster, a wounded dragon,
refusing to die while bleeding to death, raging,
striking in vain around itself with its agitated
tail." - fanciful, but perhaps appropriate!
Recommended
Recordings:
I can
recommend three excellent period instrument
versions by The Hanover Band/Huggett (Nimbus),
The Orchestre Revolutionnaire et
Romantique/Gardiner (Archiv) and The London
Classical Players/Norrington (EMI).
| Symphony
No.3 in E-flat major, op.55
("Eroica") |
Period of composition:
1803 (earliest sketches 1802, final touches
beginning 1804). Date of Publication: 1806, by
Kunst und Industrie Comptoir, dedicated to Prince
Franz Joseph von Lobkowitz.
Background
details:
Schindler
states in his biography "Beethoven As I Knew
Him" that it was the ambassador of the
French Republic to the Austrian Court, General
Bernadotte, who suggested that Beethoven should
"honour the greatest hero of the age in a
musical composition." The hero being, of
course, Napoleon Bonaparte, whom the republican
Beethoven had admired for bringing political
order out of the chaos of the bloody French
revolution. However when Napoleon proceeded to
crown himself Emperor, the enraged Beethoven,
cursing the "new tyrant", ripped the
title page (enscribed simply with the words
'Bonapart' at the top and 'Beethoven' at the
bottom) of his score in two and tossed it to the
floor. The title page of a later score still
exists with Naploeon's name violently scribbled
out by Beethoven himself. As a result of this,
Beethoven eventually settled with the title
'Heroic Symphony composed to celebrate the memory
of a great man'. It is interesting that, in his
later life, Beethoven's attitude towards Napoleon
became more sympathetic.
The Symphony
received its first semi-public performance in
April 1805 at the Theater an der Wien, with
Beethoven as the conductor. The music was awaited
with much anticipation for the story regarding
its dedication were already well known. A critic
present from the Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung
had the following to say: "This long, most
difficult composition is an extremely drawn out,
bold, and wild fantasy. Very often, though, the
work seems to lose itself in musical
anarchy" with "too many garish and
bizarre elements." No sign yet of Beethoven
pandering to popular taste! When in 1817 the poet
Christoph Kuffner asked Beethoven which was his
favorite amongst the symphonies, his reply was
'the Eroica', though the Ninth was yet to come.
Musical
outline:
The third
Symphony was a demonstration of Beethoven's
desire to develop a new, more expanded form of
composition at this time. The first movement in
sonata form (Allegro con brio) opens simply with
two arresting E-flat chords. From the sketches it
is clear that the familiar first subject idea was
fixed from the start, with a E-flat arpeggio
turning to a mysterious C sharp. What follows is
a wealth of subsidiary and transitional ideas
that culminates in the overwhelming climax of the
development. The coda brings us the first subject
in its most 'ideal' form. This technique of
'keeping the best until last' was a development
of Beethoven's that assisted the forward
progression of the music from beginning to end.
Important to the correct portrayal of this
movements character is a true observance of the
'con brio' marking. The modern tendency to play
this piece 'moderato' undermines its fundamental
drive and 'electricity'.
Then follows
the Marcia Funebre (Adagio assai). This piece
caused much confusion for the early critics, and
was not well liked, which may seem surprising
considering its influence on later generations of
composers. Many have pondered why B 'killed off'
the hero by the second movement, but a symphony
is not a biography depicting feelings rather than
events. However there is a good logic to having a
funeral march in a symphony dedicated to heroism:
what greater hero is there than one who is a
martyr to his cause? It proceeds in rondo form
with the rumbling bass strings enhanced by the
tragic wailing of the oboe. A more tender episode
follows in C major which is developed into a
triumphant fanfare. After the return of the march
the second episode, the tragic heart of the piece
begins - a double fugue. In the coda the march
theme disintegrates and ends with a final
agonising wail from the oboe.
The third
movement is a scherzo (Allegro vivace). Its
opening pianissimo on the strings follows
logically after the grief of the March, and makes
up half of the movement as a whole. With the
melody carried by the flute or oboe in B flat or
F major, the home E-flat is not achieved until
the sudden but long-delayed double -forte
passage. The main feature of the trio is the
fanfare an the French horns (where Beethoven
scores for three rather than the more usual pair
of instruments).
For the
finale (Allegro molto) we have a theme and
variations. This theme had become something of a
obsession with Beethoven, it first saw light in a
set of Contredances (WoO14), then was used in the
finale of his ballet 'Die Gestopfe des
Prometheus' and then still further as the text
for the piano variations Op35, before appearing
in the Third Symphony. Such recycling of material
was untypical of Beethoven, but he shows us his
amazing way with 'old bottles and new wine!' The
coda is a tour de force of the utmost brilliance.
Recommended
Recordings:
Good versions
exist on period instrument. These include The
London Classical Players/Norrington (EMI),
although the sound is rather 'dry'; The Hanover
Band/Goodman (Nimbus) is excellent. The Orchestra
Revolutionnaire et Romantique/Gardiner (Archiv)
has been well received, although the tempos of
the last two movements are rather too lax for
this writer, and the sound is somewhat compressed
compared to the others.
| Symphony
No.4 in B-flat major, op.60 |
Period of composition:
Summer 1806 Date of Publication: 1808, by Kunst
und Industrie Comptoir, dedicated to Count Franz
von Oppersdorff.
Background
details:
After
composing the 'Eroica', Beethoven next started
work on what is now the 5th Symphony, but this
work was laid aside when Beethoven received a
symphonic commission from the Silesian Count
Oppersdorff. Why the 5th was laid aside in not
known, it may have been that Beethoven thought a
work of the nature of the 5th would not have been
to the Counts taste, but Beethoven may have
realised that the 'Sturm und Drang' of the 5th
would have made less impact after the grandeur of
the 3rd and that a more contrasting piece was
required. The Count was a most keen music lover
and insisted that all who were in his service
played a musical instrument. The resulting
orchestra performed the 2nd Symphony for
Beethoven at the Count's castle in 1806. The
Count had possession of the piece for six months
before Beethoven was free to publish it. Little
else is known regarding the 4th's composition.
The piece was
first performed at a Benefit concert for its
composer in March 1807 and according to Schindler
received a favourable reaction from the general
public, "its impact was stronger than any of
the others...even that of the first symphony in C
major." The Viennese critics for once hailed
the new symphony "without reserve or
qualification, an honour that had granted to
almost no other instrumental composition by
Beethoven," as Schindler put it.
Musical
outline:
The more
Haydnesque approach shown in the 4th Symphony has
been given as the reason for its early
acceptance. Certainly its key was a favourite of
Haydn's later orchestral music, and there are
fewer elements within it that, to the critics,
would appear 'bizzare' compared to the others.
The positioning of the Symphony between the 3rd
and 5th has certainly led to the neglect, and the
piece as a whole is by no means lightweight.
Schumann's well known description of the piece as
a "slender Greek maiden between two Nordic
giants" has done the 4th no favours, nor is
it a particularly accurate statement.
The opening
Adagio of the first movement, with the
disconcerting E-flat repeated along its course
immediately reveals Beethoven's middle period
style despite its comparisons with Haydn. The
mystery is put aside in favour of a brash and
joyfull vigor as the main Allegro Vivace gets
underway. In performance it is important that
this vivacity is observed literally for the point
to be made.
The second
movement is Adagio with a light delicate texture
that is continuously interrupted by a repeating
figure prominent on the timpani and trumpets that
wishes to spoil this idyll. The seriousness of
these interruptions is revealed in the
development, although the status quo is soon
restored and the piece ends with the repeating
figure ethereally subdued. Beethoven's metronome
marking for this movement indicate a considerably
quicker tempo than is traditionally performed
today, however, if if observed fairly literally,
the use of Beethoven's figure reveals a
completely new nature to the piece, more dynamic
while maintaining its delicacy and the
development certainly benefits from the quicker
tempo.
The silence
is shattered with the boisterous scherzo -
Allegro vivace. The minuet-like trio is repeated
twice for the first time in the symphonies.
Beethoven's use of this A-B-A-B-A structure for a
scherzo was the result of his quest to expand his
writing musically and structurally at this time.
The final
Allegro ma non troppo is also lively and
demonstrates that, for Beethoven at least, the
proviso "ma non troppo" does not
necessarily mean that the piece be played more
moderately as a whole, rather the piece has more
contrasting elements, that is the full-bodied
allegro 'texture' is not so constant.
Recommended
Recordings:
The Hanover
band offer an excellent and exciting version on
the Nimbus label. Here the vivacity is maintained
throughout and this slow movement is given a far
swifter treatment than is the norm, to great
benefit.
| Symphony
No.5 in C minor, op.67 |
Period of composition:
1804 - 1808 Date of Publication: 1809, by
Breitkopf and Hartel, dedicated to Prince Franz
Joseph Lobkowitz and Count Andreas Razumovsky.
Background
details:
The hugely
successful 4th Symphony obviously impressed Count
Oppersdorff (who commissioned the piece) as much
as it did the critics, for the Count swiftly
offered Beethoven a new commission for another
symphony. Beethoven took this opportunity to
resurrect the sketches he had laid aside from
1804-1806 to satisfy the Count. The Count offered
500 florins for the work (as he did for the 4th
Symphony) and paid 200 in advance. However the
Count never received the symphony as Beethoven,
forever on the look-out for a good deal, saw it
fit to sell the piece to publishers Breitkopf and
Hartel in 1808 as part of a package deal that
included the 6th Symphony, the Cello Sonata Op.69
and the Piano Trios Op.70.
The piece was
first performed at a mammoth benefit concert on
22 December 1808 which included the 6th Symphony,
4th Piano Concerto, the aria "Ah
Perfido", excerpts from the Mass in C, an
improvisation by Beethoven himself and the Choral
Fantasy Op.80! The applause however was somewhat
muted. The ability to comprehend such a volume of
magnificent and extraordinary music was, perhaps,
too much to expect. Also, as the concert lasted
over four hours, the audience must have been
absolutely frozen - Beethoven having no money
left to pay for heating! A humble beginning for
what is probably the most widely known piece of
'classical' music ever written.
Musical
outline:
The four note
motto of the opening Allegro con brio is so
ingrained into the modern psyche that it is
almost impossible to distance ourselves and
assess it objectively! According to Schindler
Beethoven said of the opening bars: "Thus
Fate knocks at the door!" Whether this is
true or not, there is certainly a sense of doom
which permeates throughout the movement. The con
brio must be fully observed for the true
fearfulness of the piece to be realised. John
Eliot Gardiner argues convincingly that the
"Fate" theme has its origins in a song
of the French Revolution. These opening bars are
played on strings and clarinets alone and are
actually ambiguous tonally (the key of C minor is
confirmed only as the piece continues), with the
full orchestra being reserved for the
recapitulation and the coda. The horn heralds the
second subject and briefly C major is allowed to
triumph before ultimately being destroyed in the
coda where "Fate " has the last word.
In the second
movement, Andante con moto, we find an unusual
mix of variation and free writing, with the
galant theme being interrupted on three occasions
by a martial fanfare in C major, and the
variations themselves becoming more improvisatory
in manner.
With the
Scherzo and Trio we return to the world of C
minor. The opening theme, looms questioningly out
of the darkness on the cellos and bases. The
question is answered starkly by the second
martial theme, introduced by the horns, that is
reminiscent of the "Fate" motif of the
opening Allegro. The trio displays a virtuoso
introduction from the bass that is increasingly
taken up by the rest of the orchestra. The trio
is played twice, in common with other works of
the period such as the 4th, 6th and 7th
Symphonies but there is some dispute as to
whether it should be played only once as happened
at the premiere. The ommision of the repeat is
understandable considering the great length of
this concert, but surely for normal purposes the
movement should be played complete to hold its
own in such a monumental and powerful work as
this symphony.
The Scherzo
leads without a break into the final Allegro via
a mysterious transitionary passage with long held
notes on the strings and military tappings on the
timpani. Out of this a crescendo arises in the
last moment bursting forth the most brilliant
light of C major. What proceeds from here is the
ultimate musical symbol of triumph and this music
also has the flavour of the French revolution.
Here the trombones and piccolo, which up until
now had remained silent, have their say.
Beethoven had discussed the inclusion of these
instruments, novelties for a symphony at that
time, with Count Oppersdorff, and it is not
impossible that the Count had influenced
Beethoven in this regard. The exposition repeat
is rarely observed in performance but it is
essential to balance the weight of the Scherzo of
it is played with the full 'da capo'. The coda is
a brilliant affair along the lines of the finale
of the 3rd Symphony.
Recommended
Recordings:
The Hanover
Band/Huggett and The Orchestre Revolutionnaire et
Romantique/Gardiner offer excellent versions of
this symphony, with the period instruments
revealing the true revolutionary spirit of the
work.
| Symphony
No.6 in F major, op.68
"Pastoral" |
Period of composition:
1808 Date of Publication: 1809, by Breitkopf and
Hartel, dedicated to Prince Franz Joseph
Lobkowitz and Count Andreas Razumovsky.
Background
details:
Although a
small number sketches are to be found in
Beethoven's so-called 'Eroica' sketchbook of
1803, serious work on the 6th Symphony did not
begin until the 1808. The piece was composed,
like the C minor Symphony, at Beethoven's summer
retreat in the village of Heiligenstadt. Much
later he showed Schindler the exact locations of
great beauty that had stimulated many of the
musical ideas we hear in the composition.
Beethoven's great love of nature is well known,
though for him it was not merely the appreciation
of the beauty of the countryside. Rather, he
shared the feeling that, by knowing nature, one
could know God, a sentiment popular in art since
the time of ancient Greece through to the French
Enlightenment.
The idea of a
pastoral composition was not a new one, we have
from Haydn 'The Seasons', pastoral sinfonias are
to be found in the oratarios of Bach and Handel.
Then of course there is Vivaldi's 'The Four
Seasons.' Justin Knecht (1752-1817)
had written a symphony titled
'The musical portrait of nature' which has a five movement plan
with a first movement describing a beautiful sunlit countryside,
a storm in the 3rd movement and the finale titled 'Nature raises her
voice towards heaven offering to the creator sweet and agreable songs.'
Now it is certain that B knew of this work, even if he never heard it
performed - Sir George Grove discovered that this symphony by Knecht
was actually advertised on the cover of Beethoven's early
'Electoral' sonatas WoO47. However Beethoven was generally
contemptuous of other composers' attempts at
'tone painting', and although he himself would
not disdain on occasion from including
'imitation' into his work, the difference between
Beethoven and the others was, as Thayer puts it,
"they undertook to give musical imitations
of things essentially unmusical - he never."
Although the
original inspiration may have stemmed from his
genuine love of nature, the businessman in
Beethoven may have realised, after the success of
Haydn's composition (which nevertheless,
Beethoven scolded mercilessly), the financial
benefits to be gained from a work of this genre.
Commercial considerations may have also played a
part in Beethoven's decision to give each
movement a title. However in the published
edition he puts the disclaimer "more an
expression of feeling than painting" no
doubt in an attempt to play down the effect of
the imagery 'painted' by these titles.
The work was
premiered at the same benefit concert in Vienna
as the C minor on 22 December 1808, surely one of
the greatest concerts of all time! Ironically,
gained little profit from the concert in his
honour. After paying the musicians in advance,
Beethoven had no money left at all for luxuries
such as heating, thus the whole audience were
frozen. The receipts barely covered his
outgoings.
Musical
outline:
The first
movement is Allegro ma non troppo and is entitled
'Cheerful feelings on arriving in the
countryside.' It opens in a relaxed manner and
the opening bars provide the material from which
the rest of the movement is largely derived. When
we arrive at the first theme proper the rustic
world is immediately apparent in the droning bass
and its joyous hunt-like fanfare, the emphasis of
which is important for the point to be made in
performance, on the French horns, together with
the violins. The second second group is more
relaxed and closes with again a droning bass
cadence-theme. Repetition plays an important part
in the movement, giving a sense of natural
growth, this is especially the case in the
development.
The following
Andante molto mosso has a more specific title -
'Scene by the brook'. The apparent simplicity of
this movement drew scorn from the early critics,
who thought it childish. The sense of water
flowing is maintained by the melodic pattern
played on the lower strings. For some time there
is an outpouring of great lyricism in the home
key of B-flat yet the flow remains unbroken as an
exploration through more distant keys is
undertaken in the development. The movements
famous bird-calls are heard in the coda. The
species are even identified in the score -
nightingale, quail and cuckoo - Beethoven
honourably acknowledging the assistance his
feathered friends have provided!
The last
three movements are played without a break. The
first of these is an Allegro entitled 'Peasants
Merrymaking'. The movement equates to the scherzo
with trio, which is played twice. This ABABA
structure was a common practice for Beethoven at
this time and which served as a gravity gaining
mechanism that allowed the scherzo to command a
similar stature as the other movements whose own
structure Beethoven had expanded and developed
during his 'middle period'. The 'scherzo' section
is at one moment light and playful then at
another the merrymaking is more boisterous. The
'trio' is a rustic dance of great vigour and
exhilaration and was first sketched in the
'Eroica' sketchbook of 1803. After the second
playing of the trio, the third statement of the
opening is suddenly cut short by a rumbling on
the basses suggesting the distant roll of
thunder, and on the strings a staccato figure
representing the onset of rain. A storm is
approaching...
The 'Storm'
(Allegro) serves as a link between the third and
fifth movements, and could be seen as a more
substantial equivalent of the transition link
between the third and fourth movement of the C
minor Symphony. Here the influence once again of
French music is apparent and the piece has been
compared to the storm in Cherubini's opera
'Eliza'. In addition to the thunder and rain,
lightning is provided by sharp attacks on the
timpani. Here a piccolo and two trombones are
heard for the first time. Eventually the storm
abates as the bass rumble dies away and the
'raindrop' minims are replaced by heavenly
quavers that announce the return of tranquility
and sunlight, a time for thanksgiving...
The finale
(Allegretto) is entitled 'Shepherds song - joyful
thanksgiving after the storm.' It is a radiant
sonata-rondo whose theme is introduced by the
French horn. The rondo eventually comes to a
climax in the coda, though the true emotional
climax occurs in the closing bars, with the
hushed transformation of the rondo theme and the
distant horns echo the opening theme once more
before the movement ends simply, and humbly, with
two short chords.
Recommended
Recordings:
The Hanover
Band/Goodman (Nimbus) and The London Classical
Players/Norrington (EMI) both offer sensitive yet
exhilarating performances
| Symphony
No.7 in A major, op.92. |
Period of composition:
1811-1812 Date of Publication: 1816, by Steiner,
dedicated to Count Moritz von Fries.
Background
details:
Although
Beethoven had considered the production of a
seventh symphony as early as 1808, possibly
intended for Count Oppersdorff, it was not until
1811 that Beethoven finally started sketching
such a piece. By then he had in mind not one but
a set of three symphonies. The sketches reveal
that the 7th and 8th Symphonies were realised
side by side, although the 7th was finished first
with the main body of writing being undertaken
and completed in the spring of 1812. The sketches
of 1811 also reveal some preliminary attempts at
what was to become the choral section of the 9th
Symphony.
Beethoven had
hoped that the 7th Symphony could be performed at
the time of the Pentecost in 1812, but the
project fell through and it was not until the 8th
of December 1813, that the piece was first heard
at a charity concert in aid of Austrian and
Bavarian troops wounded in the battle with
Napoleon's army at Hanau. The concert took place
in the University Hall in Vienna and also
included Beethoven's 'Battle of Vitoria' Op.91,
better known as the 'Battle Symphony'. The timing
of the concert was perfect, such jubilant and
victorious music at a time of public relief when
Napoleon's army was all but smashed. By all
accounts it was a stupendous success and the
whole concert was repeated four days later. A
correspondent from the Allgemeine Musikalische
Zeitung attended both and wrote "the
applause rose to the point of ecstasy."
Beethoven had reached the zenith of his
popularity.
Musical
outline:
In one
respect the 7th Symphony could be a summation of
Beethoven's symphonic experience during his
so-called middle period: it included the daring
rhetorical style of the 3rd and 5th, yet also
includes structural and lyrical aspects developed
from the 4th and 6th. A strong sense of rhythmic
motion pervades the whole work, though the
description of the Symphony by Wagner as 'the
apotheosis of the dance' is perhaps too narrow.
Like the 4th
Symphony, the piece opens with a slow
introductory section, though that of the present
work is a more commanding 'Poco Sostenuto'
compared to the 'Adagio' of the 4th. This rather
vague marking has led to a great divergence in
interpretation regarding the tempo of the
opening. However if one pays attention to the
motive strength of the semiquaver scales that
appear alongside the opening minims, one should
deduce that the 'sostenuto' should not be
overdone. The opening is linked to the main
sonata form 'Vivace' by a series of solitary
exchanges between the wind and the strings that
almost brings the music to a complete halt, until
the dotted rhythm on the 'Vivace' is gently
generated. This rhythm is then maintained
vigorously throughout the remainder this
barnstorming movement of energy on a cosmic
scale. The keys of C major and F major play an
important role in the development and indeed are
a unifying factor in all four movements. In the
coda the bizarre grinding bass (which led Weber
to declare Beethoven 'ripe for the madhouse')
serves to build up enormous tension before the
release of the final climax.
Then follows
the slow movement in the minor key (Allegretto).
From the outset this movement was of great
popularity with the audiences of the day, and to
have it repeated at concerts was the norm. On
occasion it was even substituted in place of the
existing slow movements of his earlier symphonies
during performances of these works! In reality,
however, the movement is not 'Allegretto', but
'Andante'. This can be maintained on two levels -
firstly, on the original printed musical parts
the second movement were marked 'Andante', and
early reviews indicated this also. Somehow, in
later editions of the score, 'Allegretto' had
been substituted. That Beethoven was aware of
this error is reported by Schindler who stated
that "in later years the master recommended
that the first designation be restored."
Secondly, one can deduce Andante from the music
itself. The movement is quasi-variational in
design, the theme being the haunting and
melancholic march, with two intervening pastoral
episodes in the major featuring the clarinet . It
was typical of Beethoven to use a march-like
Andante theme as the source for a variation
movement, but not an Allegretto. By definition
Andante (Italian for 'to go' or 'to walk') is the
ideal tempo for such a march as this; Allegretto
is altogether something more lively. The variants
themselves are confined to accompanying figures,
for the theme itself is always present. The theme
eventually takes on a fugal form that develops to
a climax before the coda scatters the theme
quietly amongst the instruments.
The third
movement is a scherzo (Presto) in F major. Here
the sense of motion is accelerated with great
energy. The structure of the movement takes the
by now familiar ABABA with the trio (in D major)
repeated twice. Apparently the theme for the trio
has its origins as an Austrian Pilgrim's Hymn.
Whether this is true or not, it has led to the
common practise of playing the trio in a most
drawn-out fashion most unlike Beethoven's slight
reduction in tempo in the score to 'assai meno
presto'. The fact that the trio is played twice
in full and hinted at again in the coda does not
favour a lengthy conception of the trio.
The finale
(Allegro con brio) is in sonata form. The
semiquaver swirl of the first subject has its
origins in Beethoven's arrangement of the Irish
round-dance 'Save me from the grave and wise' WoO
154 No.8, though the light gaiety of the dance is
transformed into an irresistible whirlwind in its
symphonic incarnation. The second group explores
unexpected minor key territory with equal force .
In the development the victorious move to C major
occurs yet again. Further harmonic twists occur
in the recapitulation before the coda fires up
the whirlwind once more. Here an interesting
passage occurs where the first theme is passed
back and forth between the first and second
violins. The true effect of this can only be
appreciated if the first and second violins are
separated and placed to the left and right of the
conductor. This is evidence that Beethoven's
wrote his music baring this layout in mind, and
indeed all of his orchestral compositions benefit
from the separation of the violins. In the
closing phase we experience two monstrous
climaxes using the full force of the orchestra
before the book is closed in an appropriately
tidy fashion.
Recommended
Recordings:
The Hanover
Band's (Nimbus) version is very exhilarating with
good tempo. The best version on period
instruments.
| Symphony
No.8 in F major, op.93. |
Period of composition:
1811 - 1812 Date of Publication: 1817, by
Steiner.
Background
details:
Work on the
8th Symphony began alongside that of the 7th in
1811. However the lions share of the work was
done in 1812 at Linz, with the final touches
completed in the summer. At this time it seems
that the 8th was to be the second of a
prospective trio of symphonies, the third to be
in D minor, but the 8th was completed on the
threshold of a barren period for Beethoven and it
was not until 1824 that the third symphony
(Op.125) was completed.
The 8th
Symphony was premiered on 24th February 1814, at
a concert in the Redoutensaal, Vienna. Also on
the programme were the 7th Symphony Op.92, the
terzetto 'Tremate, empi, tremate' Op.116 and it
closed with the 'Battle Symphony' Op. 91. A
report in the Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung
states that while the 7th and Battle Symphonies
brought the house down, the applause for the 8th,
from which great things were expected, "was
not accompanied by that enthusiasm which
distinguishes a work which gives universal
delight; in short - as the Italians say - it did
not create a furore." The reviewer from the
AMZ went on to suggest that this luke warm
reception was due to the fact that it had
followed the 7th, which had enjoyed immediate
success from its first performance, and that if
the 8th was performed alone, then its success too
would be guaranteed.
Musical
outline:
The reason
for this relative 'failure' to satisfy the
audiences anticipation after the glorious 7th?
"Because it (the 8th) is so much
better" is Beethoven's own explanation
according to Carl Czerny. Yet much has been made
of its apparent shortcomings - the work is the
shortest of the symphonies in length, and is in
many ways a retrospective piece like that other F
major work, the quartet Op.135; a less serious
effort than its grand brother Op.92 - but how
much of this criticism bears scrutiny?
It was
typical of the highly original Beethoven to
compose a new work in a contrasting style to its
predecessor in the genre, especially when the
compositions were published in groups of three as
had been Beethoven's original concept. Thus it
would be natural for him to contrast a vast work
with of high gravity like the 7th with a shorter
piece of somewhat lighter gravity, though not
lighter quality, for in reality the 8th Symphony
is an absolute masterpiece, no less 'new', no
less serious, no less masterly than what has gone
before.
The first
movement is the extreme of pace and vitality -
'Allegro vivace e con brio'. From the outset we
realise that here the relative shortness of the
work is the result of a fundamental concept that
unites the whole composition - that of extreme
compression. There is no room here for the
'indulgence' of a slow introduction, we are
thrown straight into the action with a self
contained theme. The initial motif plays no
further part in the following exposition but is
used to great effect in the development. The
compression and consiseness is maintained in the
novel second group which has I wide range of
contrasting textures and cross-rhythms. At the
development an immense force of energy is
released on an almost frightening scale before
the reassurance of the recapitulation. The coda
closes on a humorous note, as the opening motif
is casual thrown aside. In performance it is
fundamental that the 'vivace e con brio' is fully
observed for the true energy of the movement to
be realised.
The two
'internal' movements of the Symphony are unique
in Beethoven's symphonic ouvre, but similarities
exist elsewhere, as in the Piano Sonata Op.31/3.
The first of these is the 'Allegretto scherzando'
whose staccato repeated wind chords are
humorously accompanied by fleeting melodies on
the strings. One could say that the movement is a
throwback in style to a more Haydnesque form of
wit, but the nature of the movement is unique in
the symphonic world and wholly appropriate within
the context of the composition.
The third
movement also bears a consciously retrospective
air with its explicit title 'Tempo di Menuetto'.
It is pastoral in nature. A two note 'hunting
call' playing an important role in the 'minuet',
while the trio is more relaxed, with a
beautifully flowing melody in the upper strings
contrasted with the 'hunting' French horn and a
more vigorous bass figure. Another retrospective
feature is Beethoven abandonment the now typical
five part structure where the trio is played
twice, but one could say an expansive five-part
format is redundant within the context of this
work of high compression.
The delicate
opening of the finale(Allegro vivace) belies what
is in fact a rather weighty piece of extreme pace
which matches that of the opening movement. It
posesses an unusual structure of an extended
sonata-rondo with two developments and two
recapitulations. An important feature is the
out-of-key fortissimo C sharp which bizzarely
intrudes on the vigorous main theme. The second
subject provides a contrast of joyful relaxation.
Beethoven provides interesting colour effects by
having the timpani tuned to octave Fs, an effect
he was to repeat in the scherzo of the 9th
Symphony. In the closing bars the intrusive C
sharp is eventually put out of the picture by a
continuous repetition of the F major chord which
closes the work. As with the first movement, the
vivace tempo should be observed to its fullest
extent in performance for the point of the
movement to be realised.
Recommended
Recordings:
The Orchestre
Revolutionnaire et Romantique/ Gardiner (Archiv)
offers an account of especially blistering pace.
The London Classical Players/Norrington (EMI) and
The Hanover Band/Goodman (Nimbus) are also first
rate.
| Symphony
No.9 in D minor, op.125 - 'Choral' |
Period of composition:
1817, 1822-24. Date of Publication: 1826, by
Schott, dedicated to King Friedrich Wilhelm III
of Prussia.
Background
details:
Few
compositions have had such a long and chaotic
gestation period as that of Beethoven's 9th
Symphony! As early as 1811 Beethoven made notes
in his sketchbook regarding a Symphony in D
minor, which would along with the 7th and 8th,
have completed his planned trio of symphonies.
Also at this time he penned ideas regarding
sections of Schiller's Enlightenment poem 'An die
Freude' (Ode to Joy) for use in an orchestral
setting, although Beethoven had in fact
considered putting the 'Ode' to music throughout
his career as a composer. Further sketches for
the scherzo (fugato) appeared in 1815 and 1817.
Then in 1818 Beethoven developed a plan for
another symphony with chorus based on religious
texts which, typically, came to nothing. During
1822 considerable progress was made on the first
movement, with the earlier scherzo ideas being
carried through virtually unchanged. At this time
there was nothing of the slow movement, but we do
find sketches of the 'Ode' theme noted as being
'for the finale.' However a choral finale at this
time was be no means a foregone conclusion, for
Beethoven later made a memorandum regarding a
possible fugal fourth movement.
The main body
of composition was undertaken in 1823, with the
first half of the year devoted to completion the
first movement, followed by the second in August
and the third in October. Considerable progress
was also made on the setting of Schiller's 'Ode'
although even at this stage Beethoven was still
considering an purely instrumental finale. A
melody in D minor was sketched that was
eventually to see the light of day, slightly
modified and transposed into a different key, in
the finale of the quartet op.132. Beethoven
eventually made a firm decision on the choral
version and was completed in sketch form by the
end of 1823, and written out in score during
February 1824.
The premiere
of the 9th Symphony was made at yet another
monumental concert, at the Royal Imperial Court
Theatre on May 7th, 1824. The other pieces
performed were the grand overture 'Weihe des
Hauses' op.124, and the Kyrie, Credo and Agnus
Dei from the Missa Solemnis op.123. Although the
performance was far from perfect (the performers
having only two rehearsals), and as strange as
the music must have sounded to the audience, the
effect of the symphony was overwhelming on the
audience and the applause was tumultuous.
Beethoven, in his deafness oblivious to this
reception, had to have his attention drawn by the
alto singer Karoline Unger who pulled his sleeve
and directed his gaze towards the clapping hands
and waving hats. Financially the concert made a
poor return for Beethoven due to the very large
overheads for the performance. The gross receipts
for the concert were 2,220 florins, yet once
management costs, parts copying etc. were catered
for, Beethoven was left with only 420 florins,
with some debts still to be paid! Schindler
reports that when the master received the
box-office report he collapsed and had to be
lifted onto a sofa.
Musical
outline:
Despite its
relatively late date of composition, the 9th
Symphony still is a product of the Classical
tradition and of the age of Enlightenment and
revolution - all of which were imbued in
Beethoven from an early age. The freedom and
dignity of the individual, the pain, the
suffering and the hopes of all mankind (and
indeed Beethoven himself) are all ultimately
manifested here. The emotions of the 5th Symphony
and Fidelio are profoundly intensified into a
form which stretches the media of voice and
instrument to their very limits.
The first
movement, in sonata form - Allegro ma non troppo,
on pocco maestoso - opens with the utmost
mystery. The tremulando strings and bare fifth
horns appear from the distance, as if they had
been already playing out of earshot A repeating
two-note motif gradually intensifies in volume
until the final explosion into the first subject
occurs. Who but Beethoven would then dare to
repeat the whole process again, shifting the key
from D minor to B flat major! In typical
Beethoven minor-mode style the second group
offers a pathetic hint at some form of
consolation for doubt soon sets in once more as
if to intensify the 'despair,' as Beethoven wrote
in his sketches of the movement. Uniquely in
Beethoven's symphonies there is no exposition
repeat, instead, as he did in the first
'Razumovsky' quartet op.59/1, we are led into
expecting the repeat before we are led into a
development of unparalleled energy. Here the
'despair' loses all control to a terrifying
explosion in which the two-note fragment of the
opening plays an important role. The contrast of
emotion returns in the recapitulation before the
moving firmly into the minor in the coda, with
the movement ending with an emphatic statement
based on the first subject.
Then follows
a scherzo with trio - Molto vivace - also in D
minor. The scherzo itself is in sonata form with
all parts repeated. The startling originality of
the opening bars sent the audience at the
premiere into a frenzy, with the octave tuned
drums immediately announcing the important role
they play in the tonality of the movement as a
whole. Then follows a hushed fugato, which has
first been sketched so many years ago. However
the fugue serves an introductory purpose as the
full force of the orchestra then follows a more
harmonic path with the utmost vigour. The second
subject in C major adds an unusual harmonic
flavour. The trio has a quasi-pastoral flavour,
yet this does not mean the piece should be played
at too leisurely a pace, as often occurs in
performance. The trio is played only once,
although Beethoven fools us into believing we
will here it once more at the end, only to have
it abruptly cut short and the door slammed in our
face!
The third
movement - Adagio molto e cantabile - is
quasi-variational similar and involves two
themes: Adagio molto and Andante moderato. The
structure bares similarity to the slow movement
of the 7th Symphony in that a principle theme and
variations (Adagio molto, B flat) is twice
interrupted by a contrasting episode (Andante
moderato, D major). Both themes are of
unsurpassed beauty. There is no link musically
between the themes. Indeed it seems that contrast
serves an important function in the movement as
also seen in the two dramatic fanfares hear
towards the end. In performance the movement
suffers from to broad a conception of 'Adagio
molto' at the expense of the 'cantabile' to that
the theme is often lost altogether and the
emphasis instead placed on the long-held notes.
Also it is important that the variations have an
element of dynamism within them, as they become
more elaborate, this is only fully realised at a
quicker tempo and more assertive playing.
Once
Beethoven satisfied himself that the 'Ode to Joy'
was to be included as the finale Beethoven
immediately faced two problems: the first being
how to credibly incorporate voices into what had
been, up until then, a purely instrumental piece
and make it relevant to the other movements; the
second how to introduce the 'Ode' itself. After a
dramatic call to attention, Beethoven solves the
first problem by creating a middle ground between
voice and instrument - he lets the cellos and
basses 'talk' in a gruff recitative that passes
judgement on the themes of the first three
movements and finds them all wanting. The
recitative then halts and slowly, out of this
darkness, the 'joy' theme is first heard. The
theme itself is very similar to that used by
Beethoven in his Choral Fantasy op.50 (which
itself originated from a still earlier source -
the song Gegenliebe WoO118 of 1795) and was the
product of a continuous process of rewriting. As
the theme commences, the other instruments of the
orchestra become involved and the theme is
evolved into its ideal instrumental form. But
what does Beethoven do here? He stops the whole
show, the instrumental form has had its say. Now,
with the aid of Schiller, the true musical
revelation is finally to be made.
But here we
are presented with Beethoven's second problem -
how to introduce the 'Ode', for the poem itself
has no musical connection. Beethoven struggled to
find suitable words to fulfil this requirement
but eventually he was satisfied with:
| O Freunde,
nicht diese Töne! Sondern laßt uns
angenehmere anstimmen und freudenvollere!
|
|
O friends, no
more these sounds!Let us sing more
cheerful songs,More full of joy! |
These words are sung
without accompaniment by the baritone alone. From
here he proceeds with Schiller's ode sung to the
'Joy' theme previously wrought out of the cello
and bass recitative. Beethoven does not make use
of the whole poem, rather the passages which, it
seems, he had particular sympathy. This first
verse, sung in D major, Allegro Assai, is then
repeated by the male chorus:
| Freude,
schöner Götterfunken, Tochter aus
Elysium, Wir betreten feuertrunken,
Himmlische, dein Heiligtum! Deine Zauber
binden wieder, Was die Mode streng
geteilt; Alle Menschen werden Brüder, Wo
dein sanfter Flügel weilt. |
|
Joy, bright
spark of divinity,Daughter of Elysium,
Fire-inspired we tread Thy sanctuary.Thy
magic power re-unites All that custom has
divided, All men become brothers, Under
the sway of thy gentle wings. |
With the second verse
the other soloists (tenor, mezzo-soprano,
soprano) become involved, and the verse is again
repeated, sung now by the whole chorus:
| Wem der große
Wurf gelungen, Eines Freundes Freund zu
sein, Wer ein holdes Weib errungen,Mische
seinen Jubel ein! Ja, wer auch nur eine
Seele Sein nennt auf dem Erdenrund! Und
wer's nie gekonnt, der stehle Weinend
sich aus diesem Bund. |
|
Whoever has
created An abiding friendship, Or has won
A true and loving wife, All who can call
at least one soul theirs, Join our song
of praise; But those who cannot must
creep tearfully Away from our circle. |
With the third verse,
the 'joy' theme has a slightly more urgent
flavour, again sung by the four soloists then
repeated by the chorus. The last line is repeated
once more by the chorus with emphasis placed on
each word until a dramatic climax is reached with
the word "God!":
| Freude trinken
alle Wesen An den Brüsten der Natur;
Alle Guten, alle Bösen Folgen ihrer
Rosenspur. Küsse gab sie uns und Reben,
Einen Freund, geprüft im Tod; Wollust
ward dem Wurm gegeben, Und der Cherub
steht vor Gott! |
|
All creatures
drink of joy At natures breast. Just and
unjust Alike taste of her gift; She gave
us kisses and the fruit of the vine, A
tried friend to the end. Even the worm
can feel contentment, And the cherub
stands before God! |
After the climax we
are greeted with silence, and out of this silence
the unexpected occurs, we hear the theme in the
form of a joyful march! (Alla marcia in B flat
major, quick 6/8 time). The popular tendency to
play the march at a moderate pace in performance
has the unfortunate effect of unduly halting the
progression of the movement, since another truly
moderate passage, Andante maestoso, follows
later. As the wind band plays the tenor sings
alone and repeats the last two lines with the
male chorus:
| Froh, wie
seine Sonnen fliegen Durch des Himmels
prächtgen Plan, Laufet, Brüder, eure
Bahn, Freudig, wie ein Held zum Siegen. |
|
Gladly, like
the heavenly bodies Which He sent on
their courses Through the splendour of
the firmament; Thus, brothers, you should
run your race, like a hero going to
victory! |
The march then
inspires a vigorous double fugue from the
orchestra before the chorus give a joyous repeat
of the first verse.
Now we come
to another new more profound phase Andante
maestoso, with a new theme. The first the first
two lines of the verse are sung in an imposing
manner buy the male chorus with only the trombone
for accompaniment. The lines are repeated in a
more tender fashion by the whole chorus. This
process is repeated for the third and fourth
lines. The effect produced is a demonstration
Gods awesome power, but also his love, hope and
compassion:
| Seid
umschlungen, Millionen. Diesen Kuß der
ganzen Welt! Brüder! Über'm Stemenzelt
Muß ein lieber Vater wohnen. |
|
You millions,
I embrace you. This kiss is for all the
world! Brothers, above the starry canopy
There must dwell a loving father. |
From here there is a
brief but tender instrumental interlude before
the last verse, in which our faith is questioned,
but we are given the path to find Him. Here the
profundity increases to the point of ethereal
ecstasy:
| Ihr stürzt
nieder, Millionen? Ahnest du den
Schöpfer, Welt? Such' ihn überm
Sternenzelt! Uber Sternen muß er wohnen.
|
|
Do you fall in
worship, you millions? World, do you know
your creator? Seek Him in the heavens;
Above the stars must he dwell. |
In the closing section
Beethoven brings the "Joy" and the new
"Millionen" themes together in
counterpoint with the chorus. The soloists also
have their final, tenderly lyrical say before the
chorus take control once again in the final
Baccanale whose jubilance has no comparison in
all music.
Recommended
Recordings:
Once again
the The Hanover Band is this writer's ultimate
preference. The ambient acoustic, that is a
feature of the whole series by this ensemble,
really brings out the true beauty of the period
instruments and should sound good on even a
low-grade hi-fi system. There is almost a Baroque
flavour to the sound. The Adagio is realised with
more feeling than the other period style versions
available. There is only one reservation - the
recording level of the first movement is greater
than the remainder, but an adjustment of your
volume control will cater for this. Importantly,
the set as whole is normally offered at a bargain
price, with excellent versions of the overtures
and the Missa Solemnis thrown in for good
measure. Those without preconceptions will enjoy
this music.
|